|o9dykainyu||Datum: Utorak, 28-Jan-2014, 6:25 AM | Poruka # 1|
Status: Trenutno nije na sajtu
|Digg Technology |
For just a Webpage that receives beyond 230 million page views four weeks (May 2008), Digg's technology framework is pretty streamlined. As with several proprietary system, Digg's technical department does not only say it all out there in every case to copycat. But you can find bits and pieces to become gleaned. The full setup is dependant LAMP (Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP/Perl/Python), a programming model that ties together server applications running, say, PHP, with a product like a MySQL database. It allows multiple languages to converse spanning a system architecture with minimal translation holdups.
With the Diggnation podcast documented on June 14, 2006, Kevin Rose estimated with lots of servers around 75. A 2008 post in the Digg technical blog stated how the company has between 1.8 and two.More the minimum group of servers it should keep Digg running. Using the post, not everybody at Digg really knows the actual number of servers this company actually has <source> Digg].
Within the email interview with HowStuffWorks, former Digg CEO Jay Adelson identifies the servers as Penguin Computing and Sun servers and says the net servers are running PHP also, the Debian Linux. platform, and also the database servers are running MySQL database keeper. Digg actually has not got to maintain a lot of since it deals almost exclusively in text, but Adelson reports your current setup is infinitely scalable. Digg doesn't use any cookies, only serverside storage, so that of one's user data (past Diggs, friends, comments, etc.) are saved <a href=http://sharifeyecenter.com/include/main.php?q=86>ニューバランス m1300</a> in your Digg profile, that may be saved in the Digg database. You ought to actually sign in when you are getting into the site, which in reality may be economic crisis security measure to be sure user validity for every one visit. There are a number of legitimacy checks, which Digg calls "karma checks," built in the unit at different points:
When a user efforts to submit a piece of writing, the equipment checks that the submission is legitimate that <a href=http://sharifeyecenter.com/include/index.php>http://sharifeyecenter.com/include/index.php</a> it is not spam (autosubmitted by a computer) and also that you is valid (not banned or you cannot limited). According to Adelson, the karma system also considers several factors that includes certain "unique properties to digg's critical mass of users."At the aim each submitted article comes to an end for promotion to the category homepage also know as the front page which relies on several factors, comprising the number and velocity of Diggs the system checks to be sure the Diggs are valid. One check involves in need of fraudulent accounts created used only for the goal promoting a narrative. In keeping with Adelman, "Our karma system knows the visible difference between users created to just digg a post including a user who may have interacted with the site." The device also tries autoDigging, the computerized Digging of any story to fraudulently promote it in to the homepage.
Adelman confirms you will find zero editorial control happening at Digg behind the scenes, whether in submission, promotion or burying (the removal of a tale from your Digg queue). There is absolutely no censorship of submissions beyond letting an end user first turn on a profanity filter that blocks curse words. And Digg manages "buries" like it manages anything else with a proprietary algorithm. The system <a href=http://sharifeyecenter.com/include/index.php?q=85>http://sharifeyecenter.com/include/index.php?q=85</a> runs a "depromotion algorithm" that determines because a reported story is going to disappear on the main site pages.
Considerable time sounds very democratic and forwardthinking, with Digg moving us further for the path of the populist Web that turns regular Joes into entrepreneurs, reporters, editors, stock traders and encyclopedia contributors. But something of a hubbub in mid2006 called Digg's utterly userdriven nature into question at least in the minds of your select and verbal few. This over doubled depends upon raised by Digg since Kevin Rose founded the corporate in 2004 <source> Rocky Mountain News].